559
Lordship the correspondence relating to the extension of
Supreme Court Vacations and that I did so without first
giving him an opportunity of commenting upon it. He adds
that he had always intended to submit the whole question
to Your Lordship. I had no knowledge of such intention nor
did Sir F. Piggott make any mention of it prior to his
letter of the 16th. ultimo; and I had no intention of
troubling Your Lordship with the correspondence had not Sir
F. Piggott dragged the subject into his letter of the 12th.
of March, regarding the status of the Registrar of the
Supreme Court, as an instance of "the Official ignoring
of the Judges* of which he alleged that he had on many
occasions to complain.
The letter to the "China Mail*
was a part of the correspondence which I deemed it my duty
to include, and had I done so without comment, I should
have led Your Lordship to infer that I saw no irregularity
in the course His Honour had adopted.
In the circumstances in which the
Chief Justice alluded to the correspondence,
46
viz.:- in
support of an accusation that the Government ignored the
Judges - he could hardly expect that I could do otherwise
than forward for Your Lordship's information the corres- -pondence
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.